Blake Lively smear campaign claims have taken a major turn as the actress says she lost around $64 million in income during her ongoing legal fight with Justin Baldoni. The case is linked to allegations from Lively that a negative online campaign damaged her career and reputation after conflict on the set of their film It Ends With Us. Blake Lively, known for her role in Gossip Girl, says the dispute has had a serious financial impact. She argues that the fallout from the case has reduced her work opportunities in Hollywood. Her legal team claims the losses are directly connected to what she describes as a targeted smear campaign linked to Baldoni’s side. The legal conflict began during the production of the 2024 romantic drama It Ends With Us. Lively accused Justin Baldoni, her co-star and director, of sexual harassment and creating an unsafe work environment. Baldoni has denied the claims. Since then, both sides have been involved in ongoing court action and public disputes. In a court filing submitted on 17 April, Lively’s legal team presented an estimate of financial damage. They claimed she suffered about $64 million in lost income. This figure includes missed acting roles, endorsements, and other career opportunities that she says were affected during the controversy. The filing also focuses on online activity. It claims that terms such as “bully,” “mean girl,” and “tone deaf” were used during the alleged smear campaign. According to her team, these messages reached more than 176 million online impressions. They estimate this resulted in financial damage of around $36.5 million to $40.5 million. The document also says statements made by Baldoni’s lawyer added to the situation. It claims these comments created around 116 million impressions online. The legal team estimates this caused an additional loss of about $24.3 million in value. Together, these figures make up the reported $64 million total loss. The Blake Lively smear campaign case has also moved through early court decisions. On 2 April, a judge dismissed 10 of 13 claims made by Lively against Baldoni. The court said there was not enough evidence to support claims of sexual harassment in those specific counts. However, the judge did not fully close the case. The judge also noted that there was some evidence suggesting a plan may have been made to harm Lively’s career. This part of the ruling kept the case alive for further review. The court said key questions about online activity and intent should be decided by a jury. Both sides strongly disagree about what happened online. Lively’s team argues that negative attention was coordinated and aimed at damaging her reputation. Baldoni’s team says any online criticism was organic and not controlled. The court acknowledged this dispute and said it needs further examination. The case has attracted attention because it involves both Hollywood and social media influence. It raises questions about how online comments can affect real careers. It also highlights how legal disputes can grow quickly in the digital age. Industry observers say the financial claims are significant. A $64 million loss estimate places the case among the higher-value celebrity legal disputes in recent years. However, the final outcome will depend on further legal proceedings and possible jury review. The film at the center of the dispute, It Ends With Us, was expected to be a major release. Instead, it has become part of a wider legal and public controversy. The situation has placed both stars under intense media attention. Lively’s legal team continues to argue that her career has been damaged by the dispute. They say the online backlash has had long-term effects on her earning power. Baldoni’s representatives continue to deny wrongdoing and maintain that claims against him are unfounded. The case is still ongoing. No final ruling has been made on the full claims. More hearings are expected as both sides prepare further legal arguments. The Blake Lively smear campaign case is likely to continue drawing attention as it moves forward. It combines celebrity conflict, legal debate, and questions about online influence in modern entertainment.