Palantir UK contract fears have grown after strong criticism of a new online manifesto from the US tech company Palantir. The company shared a long post on X that praised American power and made comments about global culture and military strength. The post has triggered concern among UK politicians. Some MPs say it raises serious questions about the firm’s role in public services in Britain. The manifesto included 22 points. It said some cultures have made key progress while others remain “dysfunctional and regressive”. It also called for the US to bring back a military draft. It said strong military power is needed for free and democratic societies to survive in the modern world. The post also warned that future warfare will be driven by artificial intelligence and autonomous weapons. The message also said the world should not delay in building AI weapons. It argued that rival nations will continue developing military technology without hesitation. The post suggested that the West must act quickly to stay ahead. Many readers compared the tone of the message to science fiction themes and extreme political views. UK MPs reacted strongly to the statement. Some described it as disturbing and inappropriate for a company working with sensitive public data. Martin Wrigley, a Liberal Democrat MP, said the message looked like something from a fictional robot film. He said it raised concerns about whether Palantir is suitable to handle UK government projects. He also questioned the company’s respect for democratic values. Another Labour MP, Rachael Maskell, also criticised the firm. She said Palantir appears to be shaping ideas around defence and technology policy. She warned that the company is more than a normal tech supplier. She said the government must understand the company’s views before continuing its contracts. She also suggested reviewing its role in public services. Palantir UK contract fears are linked to the company’s growing presence in Britain. Palantir has secured more than £500 million in UK contracts. This includes a £330 million agreement with the NHS. It also works with police and the Ministry of Defence. The company is also involved in data projects linked to financial regulation. Some MPs have called for these deals to be reviewed or stopped. Critics say the company’s influence in public systems is expanding too quickly. They argue that access to health and security data must be carefully controlled. They also warn that private firms with strong political views should not guide public policy decisions. The debate has become more intense in recent months as more contracts have been awarded. Palantir chief executive Alex Karp has also made public comments that added to the debate. He has spoken about global politics and technology in ways that critics say go beyond normal business views. In past interviews, he suggested that technology and AI could change political behaviour. These comments have also raised questions in political circles. Despite the criticism, Palantir defends its work in the UK. A company spokesperson said its software supports the NHS and helps improve health services. It said its tools help reduce cancer diagnosis time and improve hospital operations. The company also said it helps the Royal Navy stay operational for longer periods. It added that it supports efforts to protect vulnerable people, including victims of domestic violence. The spokesperson also highlighted its UK workforce. It said 17 percent of its employees are based in Britain. The company said this is the highest share among the world’s 20 largest tech firms. It argued that its work brings value to public services and improves efficiency. Even with these claims, political pressure is increasing. MPs and campaign groups continue to raise concerns about transparency and influence. They say public trust must come first when dealing with sensitive data systems. The debate is now expected to continue in Parliament as scrutiny of government contracts grows. Palantir UK contract fears are now part of a wider discussion about technology, security, and public trust. As more government departments rely on digital systems, questions about private sector influence are likely to increase. The coming months may decide whether the company’s role in UK public services expands or faces tighter limits.